Submitted By: Doru Botex
Justification:
Up to now a Charger (Converter) was considered to be a device that converts AC power to DC power. Due to the electrification of recreational vehicles, a converter device can also be a DC-to-DC converter/charger which converts DC power taken from the starter/chassis battery to DC power that can be used to charge the main/house battery.
A DC-to-DC Converter can be unidirectional, or bidirectional.
The changes from this submission are meant to add few DGN fields that indicate the converter type as AC-to-DC or DC-to-DC as well as to indicate if the device is unidirectional or bidirectional and allow for charging direction control.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 6.20 Charger_Converter_proposed_changes.docx | 116.69 KB |
Please Sign in to View
Log in to view member-only content.
If you believe you are receiving this message in error contact us at memberservices@rvia.org.
Martin Perlot Member for 1 year
Nice submission.
OBJECTION
CHARGER_COMMAND - Direction
The 10b value is reserved for error conditions, and although this is a command (and "error" wouldn't make any sense), we should avoid using this value. I suggest expanding the field to 3 bits, which would allow 10b to be used unambiguously as "Auto".
Introduction
There is some ambiguity in the description. This scheme requires a DC-DC Charger to report using two different instances. This opens up a number of questions regarding how data is reported and commands accepted.
Some of the answers are contained in the tests (and kudos to you for writing good tests!), but these should be clarified up front.
SUGGESTION
According to CHARGER_COMMAND, the directionality may be temporary or permanent. A status field to indicate which is the case seems appropriate, as well as a command (or additional values in the Direction command). Another flag to indicate "auto" mode seems appropriate. CHARGER_PROPERTIES is full, so I suggest created "DC-DC_CHARGER_PROPERTIES" and put all the new fields there. (I have the feeling that this DGN is going to expand pretty quickly anyway.)
QUESTION
Is there any overlap between this and DC_DISCONNECT? Do these products do double-duty as a bridge (e.g. for starting the engine when the chassis battery is dead?)